Q&A and Book Giveaway with Gene Jennings

It’s the 150th post here at mattamesblogs.com.  I like to do something special when we hit the big numbers around these parts.  You may remember my 100th post featuring an interview and book giveaway with Kem Meyer.  Since that time, I’ve been looking forward to the opportunity of doing the same with another great author and church leader: Gene Jennings.

Gene is the Associate Pastor of TrueNorth Church in North Augusta, SC, and has been doing the clergy gig since 1987.   His latest book, Laughing with Sarah, is one full of practical application for following Christ. With a collection of essays ranging from what the “Thanksgiving killer” is to the main business of your life, you’re going to find something in this book for you. 

Gene, where do you feel the boat can be missed in applying the Bible to everyday life between the mountaintops and valleys, and how does Laughing with Sarah help make that connection?

I think we “miss the boat” by not being familiar with the message of the Bible and its context. It seems that a lot of believers no longer read the Bible as a whole but seek a verse or two to solve their problems. It’s easier than ever to find a meaningful verse with all of the cool technology we have. Our society is ADD and we are guilty of looking for quick answers and succinct Bible verses to help us along the way.

Now, I’m all for Scripture memory and clinging to special verses of the Bible. I do it quite often. I guess my fear is that a lot of Christ-followers are Biblically illiterate when it comes to understanding the Bible as a whole. A lot of Bible teachers use the topical approach rather than an expository approach.

Let me define those two terms. The topical approach asks the question, “What does the Bible say about this subject and how can I apply it to my life?” It uses the Bible as a reference guide with answers that can be found in a concordance. The expository approach to teaching the Bible asks the question, “What does the Bible say in its context and how should I respond to it?” For example, if you wanted to do a study on faith you could look in a concordance or do a word search for verses with the word “faith.” That would be a topical approach. Or you could read the story of Abraham offering Isaac as a sacrifice and consider Abraham’s faith. That would be an expository approach.

They are both fine approaches to studying the Bible but I think it is lop-sided now. We tend to hear more topical preaching than expository and by doing so it limits our knowledge of the Scriptures. Think of it this way. Would you know more about a book by reading it cover to cover or by just picking sentences from random parts of it?

In life, we have mountaintop experiences and we also go through deep valleys. But most of the time we find ourselves somewhere in between those two extremes. Laughing with Sarah uses both approaches to the Bible to cover everyday life topics that we all deal with between the mountaintops and the valleys. It’s about being obedient to God and deepening one’s walk with Christ. It’s about putting things off, starting things over, being perpetually grateful to God and being constantly motivated to serve him.

 

You can find out more about Laughing with Sarah and get a copy of your own at http://www.LaughingWithSarah.com.

Congratulations to Thea Hedglin for winning an autographed copy of Laughing with Sarah. See the video of the drawing here.

Less Clutter. Less Noise. Book Tour

Less Clutter. Less Noise.

If you’re looking for proven “now” communication strategies to make every aspect of a person’s engagement with your church or organization more rewarding, then make this book happen for you.  Reading Less Clutter. Less Noise. will shape the way you do things.  Author and Communications Director Kem Meyer knows her stuff and shares her experiences, as well as practices that are currently in play.

Kem, what ways have you found effective to communicate to regulars, who like the way things are, why changes are necessary in order to better connect with guests?

The best technique I’ve found is to create space for conversations with leaders (staff or volunteer). If I invest in them, they help carry the torch to their sphere of influence. I ask the same types of questions to “lead the witness” and navigate around talking points to help shape shift perspectives (for me and them). A friend of mine had the title of Communications Director but said it should be changed to Communications Redirector because he spent 50% of his time redirecting people and projects. I think it is a fair perspective and good example to follow, regardless of what your role or job title may be.

Sometimes there is tension, though, because people are coming to you to get something done. They really aren’t interested in being “re-directed” or processing more questions with you. Other times, the tension is there because what they’re asking you for isn’t going to help them. In fact, it might even hinder them—and you know it. But, they didn’t come for you to tell them they’re wrong. You can’t sell what they’re not looking for.

Every conversation and project has different dynamics, but if you can find a system that helps you avoid spending too much time creating or too much time regulating, it’s a win. It’s never a win if you consistently find yourself playing the role of the communications police. One way is to start every project with a healthy skepticism and simply…ask questions.

Somebody smart told me about the three areas they evaluate for everything they do. I don’t remember the who, but the what stuck, and it is a system we use. Here are the three areas we use as a filter to evaluate everything we do and some of the questions we ask along the way.

  • Is it appealing (context)? Are we focusing our energy from the “inside out” or from the “outside in”? Do we know why people will spend their time and attention on us? Does it apply to their life in a practical way? What makes it worth the hassle? Do we know the comfort zone?
  • Is it engaging (presentation)? Are we unifying our message or diluting it? Are we reducing the noise in people’s life or adding to it? Are we removing the barriers to entry? What problem is this solving? Does this support or compete with the intended experience for our audience? Are we making things easy for them to find? Easy to understand? Easy to do?
  • Is it helpful (content)? Are we giving people what they want, when they want it? Or, are we answering questions they haven’t asked yet? What expectations are we setting that are unrealistic or out of our control? Are we promising something we can’t deliver on?  Are we making statements as if they were facts, when in reality they are subjective and left to personal interpretation? Are we baiting people with exaggerated benefits?

Sometimes, you’ll end up leading the witness with your questioning; other times, the two-way collaboration comes naturally. Either way, the result is breakthrough thinking and new insights from everyone on the same page.

[The contest portion is now closed. Thank you for the excellent dialogue.  Keep it coming.  Congratulations to Alicia Nordeen for winning a copy of the book!]

Comment on the Q&A with the answer to one of the questions below.

  • What kind of potential can better communication have where you work or worship?
  • Where is there a need for less clutter and noise in your life?
  • Bonus: Create your own and answer it! [But be surrious about it. React to the Q&A, if you'd like.]

Have fun!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 246 other followers